Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > users > Re: 64-bit and current > Reply to message

Project highlights: Stable Version: 1.6.1, Development Version: 1.7.6

current
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author theslack
Full name Jack Neely
Date 2006-05-19 10:32:30 PDT
Message The arch is gotten from RPM not from the uname. However, I do think
its really interesting why your arch is that.

Can you send me the output of :

   rpm -q --qf "%{name}-%{version}-​%{release}:%{epoch}.​%{arch}\n" redhat-release

/me hopes I typed that right.

Jack


On 5/19/06, Drew Myers <drew at sundawg dot org> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply Jack.
>
> The systemid file reports ia32e, though uname -i reports x86_64. Not
> sure where that discrepancy is coming from.
>
> I modified my channel definition in the database to use ia32e, and
> everything's working cleanly now :).
>
> I'm curious about why the difference in systemid's notion of the
> architecture vs uname's though.
>
> Thanks again Jack!
>
>
> drew
> --
>
> Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear.
> - Mark Twain
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cu​rrent.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help at current dot tigris dot org
>
>