Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > users > Re: RedHat ES4 > Reply to message

Project highlights: Stable Version: 1.6.1, Development Version: 1.7.6

current
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Hunter Matthews <thm@duke.edu>
Full name Hunter Matthews <thm@duke.edu>
Date 2005-04-19 08:29:39 PDT
Message On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:10, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 05:40:10PM -0400, Jason Parsons wrote:
>
> > Can you cite the section of their license agreement which you believe
> > is being violated? I read this:

Reasonable flame free license discussion snipped.

I'm going to come down from on high here and state that I want this
thread to stop - while you are both reasonable people trying to
understand something, neither of you is, to my knowledge, a licensed
attorney, so anything you might decide would not be legally binding.

Please.

If you have N systems, you need N licenses from RHN -- current won't
help you with getting by with less than N licenses.

I had no idea people with N licenses were still interested in using
current as a distribution mechanism. I'm thinking about that right now.

But without commentary or an opinion* from a lawyer or one of the RH
people, please end this debate (or take it off channel).


* I use opinion here in the legal sense.
--
Hunter Matthews Unix / Network Administrator
Office: BioScience 145/244 Duke Univ. Biology Department
Key: F0F88438 / FFB5 34C0 B350 99A4 BB02 9779 A5DB 8B09 F0F8 8438
Never take candy from strangers. Especially on the internet.


--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cu​rrent.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help at current dot tigris dot org